Fighting for Your Rights in the Greater Cincinnati Region
Increasingly, immigration practitioners and foreign nationals seeking benefits
from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) face long delays
in application processing. In some instances, these delays become unreasonable
and can add up to years over the advised processing times quoted by USCIS.
In the case of an unreasonable delay, it may ultimately be necessary to
bring a civil action against government agencies.
Before seeking redress by federal court, however, there are other means
to seek redress, such as:
Using expedite procedures offered by USCIS (e.g. premium processing)
Contacting a congressional liaison to inquire on the applicant’s behalf
Contacting USCIS to check case status
It is important to follow these steps before bringing an action in federal
court, as a plaintiff may be required to prove that they exhausted all
administrative remedies before seeking redress from the courts. Documented
proof that the above steps have been taken will serve as evidence that
the plaintiff has exhausted all administrative remedies and, therefore,
is eligible for relief from the court.
To bring a suit in federal court, a plaintiff must file a complaint in
the correct district. In the complaint, the plaintiff must outline:
Why the venue the plaintiff has chosen is appropriate
Why the court they are addressing has jurisdiction
Parties against whom the claim is brought
What relief the plaintiff is requesting from the court
Our team at
The Fleischer Law Firm LLC can guide you through this process and advocate for your rights. Our
immigration litigation attorneys have decades of experience, and we look forward to putting this experience
to work for you.
Understanding Your Legal Rights: A Free Consultation
At The Fleischer Law Firm LLC, we believe that knowledge is power. Understanding
your legal rights is crucial, especially when facing complex legal challenges.
That’s why we offer a complimentary consultation to discuss your
case and explore your options. Whether you’re dealing with personal
injury, family law, or criminal defense, our experienced attorneys are
here to provide the guidance you need.
During your free consultation, you can expect:
Personalized Attention: Our attorneys will take the time to listen to your story and understand
your unique circumstances.
Expert Legal Insights: Gain clarity on your legal situation and receive expert advice tailored
to your needs.
Transparent Process: We will explain the legal process in simple terms, so you know what to
expect moving forward.
No Obligation: There’s no pressure to hire us after the consultation. We want you
to feel comfortable and informed before making any decisions.
Don’t navigate the complexities of the legal system alone. Contact
The Fleischer Law Firm LLC today to schedule your free consultation and
take the first step towards protecting your rights.
Choosing a Venue
Venue refers to the district in which the case is brought. Venue is always
proper against government agencies or officials in the judicial district
where plaintiff resides. However, the plaintiff’s district may not
be convenient, or the district may have case law that is not advantageous
to the plaintiff’s position. It may be necessary, then, to bring
the suit in another district where the government defendants reside. Plausibly,
the government defendants reside anywhere there is a district office.
However, courts usually require the district office to have engaged in
a substantial portion of the activity discussed in the plaintiff’s
complaint.
Jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to make a decision on
a plaintiff’s case. In immigration matters involving unreasonable
delay, the source of jurisdiction differs depending on whether the plaintiff
filed an application for adjustment of status or for naturalization.
In cases involving
adjustment of status, jurisdiction is most commonly found in the Mandamus statute and the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA).The Mandamus Act gives federal district courts the
power to compel an agency to act where the agency has failed to perform
its duty. To bring a successful mandamus claim, you must first determine
if the delay is “unreasonable.” Plaintiffs can show unreasonableness
by proving that they have exhausted all administrative remedies before
suing. Evidence of failed attempts to resolve the delay administratively
gives strength to the argument that the delay is unreasonable and that
judicial action is the last and only resort.
In cases involving
naturalization applications, jurisdiction can be found under the Mandamus Act and the APA, as with
adjustment of status cases discussed above. In addition, 8 U.S.C. ¤1447(b)
specifically gives applicants the right to apply for a hearing if the
agency fails to make a determination within 120 days of the case examination.
While the relevant statutes provide a specific timeline for the agency
to act, judges may nonetheless look to the reasonableness of the delay
in fashioning a remedy. It is still important, then, to exhaust all administrative
remedies before bringing an action in federal court.
There has been some disagreement among jurisdictions as to what the “examination”
entails. Government defendants always assert that the “examination”
includes not only the interview, but also the completion of the FBI name
check. They argue then, that plaintiffs do not have standing to bring
suits because 120 days have not passed from the completion of the examination
since the examination has yet to conclude. A majority of courts, including
one in the Southern District of Ohio, however, have ruled that the “examination”
consists only of the interview. Therefore, most cases that have been pending
for more than 120 days after the date of the applicant’s interview
are reviewable by a federal district court.
Other problems arise if the unreasonable delay in a naturalization case
arises before the interview is conducted. In these situations, the government
tends to argue that they have discretion as to when to schedule an interview
on a naturalization application, and thus APA arguments would be null
in these situations. However, the naturalization statute appears to mandate
a decision on an application, which would imply a timely scheduling of
an interview and decision on the matter. In addition, regulations implementing
the naturalization statute contain mandatory language indicating that
the agency must act on an application. According to the regulations, the
applicant must be notified that their application has been granted or denied.
Relief Requested & Parties to the Suit
Plaintiffs should ask for the following relief:
Compel USCIS to adjudicate the application within 60 days
Compel the FBI to issue the results of a criminal background and/or name
check relating to plaintiff to USCIS and the court within 60 days
Award attorney’s fees to the plaintiff if they are the prevailing party
Regarding parties to the suit, it is usually better to err on the side
of suing more officials rather than less. This is because defendants can
always be dropped from the suit, whereas adding more defendants can be
difficult.
A petitioner should, then, name the following officials when filing a mandamus
or APA action challenging immigration adjudication delays:
Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Director of USCIS
Director of the service center where the application or petition is located
District director of the local USCIS office with jurisdiction over the plaintiff
Director of the FBI (if delay is a result of a pending FBI name check)
Some may also name the U.S. Attorney General, but this is not necessary
because the Homeland Security Act of 2002 vests immigration as a function of DHS.
Call
(513) 880-9969 or
send us an online message to get started with our Cincinnati immigration lawyers today. We offer
same-day services, payment plans, and complimentary consultations.
The Attorneys You Need on Your Side
Immigration litigation is not like any ordinary civil lawsuit. The U.S.
immigration system is heavily resourced, and convincing a court to override
the decisions or operations of an agency can be a tremendous challenge
without adequate support. Fortunately, our team at The Fleischer Law Firm
LLC has decades of experience in litigation, and we have what it takes
to help you overcome your legal issue. We are trusted by Cincinnati and
surrounding areas with some of the community’s most complex cases,
and we look forward to serving you next.
“I cannot thank Neil Fleischer and his team at The Fleischer Law Firm enough.”
I cannot thank Neil Fleischer and his team at The Fleischer Law Firm enough for the exceptional work on my immigration case. From day one, they were knowledgeable, responsive, and genuinely cared about my outcome. Their expertise and attention to detail made a stressful process much more manageable—and ultimately successful. If you need a dedicated and trustworthy immigration lawyer, I highly recommend them.
L.E.
“I highly recommend Attorney Neal A. Fleischer.”
I highly recommend Attorney Neal A. Fleischer. He is not only an outstanding immigration lawyer, but also a truly honest and compassionate person. He helped my mother successfully obtain her Green Card last year, and today I returned to him again to start the immigration process for my father and brothers. His professionalism, patience, and humanity stand out every single time. Without question, Neal A. Fisher is one of the best immigration attorneys in the United States. If you are looking for someone you can truly trust with your case, he is the one.
E.A.
“Neil is an amazing lawyer”
Neil is an amazing lawyer and I would recommend him to anyone. He is very responsive and would answer my email anytime. He made our process very easy and smooth. I was able to get my green card in less than a year. Thank you Neil for your patience and Time.
A.A.
“Most trusted and professional law firm.”
I’ve been a client of Neil Law Firm LLC for over 10 years and without their strong skills, professionalism and amazing team work I would not be able to become a US citizen last week. My journey went from F1 visa to O1 to EB1 green card and finally: citizenship Most trusted and professional law firm. I can’t thank them enough.
E.K.
“Congrats to Dorcas!”
This is Dorcas from Ghana. We love to get photos and feedback from our clients! She is now a US citizen based on her hard work and good moral character.
"Today was awesome. I am finally a citizen thanks to you!"